Yi 34B vs Yi 6B: Benchmark Comparison
Detailed comparison of Yi 34B and Yi 6B covering benchmarks, pricing, context window, and compliance.
Key Specifications
| Specification | Yi 34B | Yi 6B |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | other | other |
| Version | yi-34b | yi-6b |
| Release Date | 2023-11-05 | 2023-11-05 |
| Context Window | 4096 tokens | 4096 tokens |
| Input Modalities | text | text |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
| License | Apache 2.0 | Apache 2.0 |
| SOC2 | ✗ | ✗ |
| HIPAA | ✗ | ✗ |
| GDPR | ✗ | ✗ |
| ISO 27001 | ✗ | ✗ |
Benchmark Results
| Benchmark | Yi 34B | Yi 6B | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARC | 87.2 | 88.4 | Yi 6B |
| BBH | 48.8 | 55.3 | Yi 6B |
| GPQA | 20.6 | 26.3 | Yi 6B |
| GSM8K | 48.3 | 37 | Yi 34B |
| HUMANEVAL | 35.8 | 42.3 | Yi 6B |
| IFEVAL | 48.2 | 54.9 | Yi 6B |
| MATH | 20.5 | 29.9 | Yi 6B |
| MMLU | 55.5 | 68 | Yi 6B |
| MUSR | 36.8 | 29.5 | Yi 34B |
| WINOGRANDE | 71.5 | 72.2 | Yi 6B |
Pricing Comparison
| Tier (per Mtok) | Yi 34B | Yi 6B |
|---|---|---|
| Input | $0.4 | $0.18 |
| Output | $0.4 | $0.18 |
| Cache Read | $0 | $0 |
| Cache Write | $0 | $0 |
Yi 34B vs Yi 6B
Model Overview
Yi 34B and Yi 6B are both notable options in the AI model market. This page compares their benchmarks, pricing, and compliance.
Key Specifications
| Vendor | Release Date | Context Window | License |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other / Other | 2023-11-05 / 2023-11-05 | 4K / 4K | Apache 2.0 / Apache 2.0 |
Benchmark Performance
| Benchmark | Yi 34B | Yi 6B | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARC | 87.2 | 88.4 | B |
| BBH (BIG-Bench Hard) | 48.8 | 55.3 | B |
| GPQA | 20.6 | 26.3 | B |
| GSM8K (Grade School Math 8K) | 48.3 | 37.0 | A |
| HumanEval | 35.8 | 42.3 | B |
| IFEval | 48.2 | 54.9 | B |
| MATH | 20.5 | 29.9 | B |
| MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding) | 55.5 | 68.0 | B |
| MUSR | 36.8 | 29.5 | A |
| WinoGrande | 71.5 | 72.2 | B |
Pricing Comparison
| Input | Output | Cache Read | Cache Write |
|---|---|---|---|
| — / — | — / — | — / — | — / — |
per million tokens — A / B
Strengths & Weaknesses
Yi 34B
- ✅ Reliable general-purpose model.
- ⚠️ MMLU 55.5, weak knowledge reasoning.
- ⚠️ HumanEval 35.8, coding weak.
- ⚠️ Proprietary, not self-hostable.
- ⚠️ Context window 4K is limited.
Yi 6B
- ✅ Reliable general-purpose model.
- ⚠️ HumanEval 42.3, coding weak.
- ⚠️ Proprietary, not self-hostable.
- ⚠️ Context window 4K is limited.
Editor’s Take
Yi 34B and Yi 6B each have their strengths. Choose based on workload (code, long context, vision), referencing the tables above.
FAQ
Which model is better for coding tasks?
Refer to the HumanEval benchmark table; the model with a higher score is better suited for coding tasks.
Which model is cheaper?
Refer to the pricing comparison table above; the model with lower input/output prices is more cost-effective.
Which has a longer context window?
Refer to the key specifications table; the model with a larger context window is better for long documents.
References
Editor's Take
See Editor's Take section.