Gemma 2 27B vs Gemma 2 9B: Benchmark Comparison
Detailed comparison of Gemma 2 27B and Gemma 2 9B covering benchmarks, pricing, context window, and compliance.
Key Specifications
| Specification | Gemma 2 27B | Gemma 2 9B |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | ||
| Version | gemma-2-27b | gemma-2-9b |
| Release Date | 2024-06-27 | 2024-06-27 |
| Context Window | 8192 tokens | 8192 tokens |
| Input Modalities | text | text |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
| License | Gemma License | Gemma License |
| SOC2 | ✓ | ✓ |
| HIPAA | ✗ | ✗ |
| GDPR | ✓ | ✓ |
| ISO 27001 | ✓ | ✓ |
Benchmark Results
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Gemma 2 9B | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARC | 93.1 | 90.3 | Gemma 2 27B |
| BBH | 71.2 | 66.7 | Gemma 2 27B |
| GPQA | 35.4 | 30.3 | Gemma 2 27B |
| GSM8K | 77.4 | 64.3 | Gemma 2 27B |
| HUMANEVAL | 72.4 | 60.9 | Gemma 2 27B |
| IFEVAL | 72.5 | 64.3 | Gemma 2 27B |
| MATH | 35.5 | 28.9 | Gemma 2 27B |
| MMLU | 77.4 | 64.3 | Gemma 2 27B |
| MUSR | 53 | 44.1 | Gemma 2 27B |
| WINOGRANDE | 80.5 | 72.5 | Gemma 2 27B |
Pricing Comparison
| Tier (per Mtok) | Gemma 2 27B | Gemma 2 9B |
|---|---|---|
| Input | $0.7 | $0.3 |
| Output | $0.7 | $0.3 |
| Cache Read | $0 | $0 |
| Cache Write | $0 | $0 |
Gemma 2 27B vs Gemma 2 9B
Model Overview
Gemma 2 27B and Gemma 2 9B are both notable options in the AI model market. This page compares their benchmarks, pricing, and compliance.
Key Specifications
| Vendor | Release Date | Context Window | License |
|---|---|---|---|
| Google / Google | 2024-06-27 / 2024-06-27 | 8K / 8K | Gemma License / Gemma License |
Benchmark Performance
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Gemma 2 9B | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARC | 93.1 | 90.3 | A |
| BBH (BIG-Bench Hard) | 71.2 | 66.7 | A |
| GPQA | 35.4 | 30.3 | A |
| GSM8K (Grade School Math 8K) | 77.4 | 64.3 | A |
| HumanEval | 72.4 | 60.9 | A |
| IFEval | 72.5 | 64.3 | A |
| MATH | 35.5 | 28.9 | A |
| MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding) | 77.4 | 64.3 | A |
| MUSR | 53.0 | 44.1 | A |
| WinoGrande | 80.5 | 72.5 | A |
Pricing Comparison
| Input | Output | Cache Read | Cache Write |
|---|---|---|---|
| — / — | — / — | — / — | — / — |
per million tokens — A / B
Strengths & Weaknesses
Gemma 2 27B
- ✅ Reliable general-purpose model.
- ⚠️ Proprietary, not self-hostable.
- ⚠️ Context window 8K is limited.
Gemma 2 9B
- ✅ Reliable general-purpose model.
- ⚠️ Proprietary, not self-hostable.
- ⚠️ Context window 8K is limited.
Editor’s Take
Gemma 2 27B and Gemma 2 9B each have their strengths. Choose based on workload (code, long context, vision), referencing the tables above.
FAQ
Which model is better for coding tasks?
Refer to the HumanEval benchmark table; the model with a higher score is better suited for coding tasks.
Which model is cheaper?
Refer to the pricing comparison table above; the model with lower input/output prices is more cost-effective.
Which has a longer context window?
Refer to the key specifications table; the model with a larger context window is better for long documents.
References
Editor's Take
See Editor's Take section.